There are no meaningful differences in nutritional quality and wholesomeness between conventional milk and that labeled as organic, according to study from the Cornell University Department of Animal Science and the Monsanto Co. The study was published in the May issue the Journal of Dairy Science.
Consumers are becoming increasingly health conscious, and food product choices have expanded. Choices in the dairy case include fluid milk labeled according to production management practices. Such labeling practices may be misunderstood and perceived by consumers to reflect differences in the quality or nutritional content of milk.
Thus, the study’s objective was to investigate nutritional differences in specialty labeled milk, specifically to compare the fatty acid (FA) composition of conventional milk with milk labeled as recombinant bST (rbST)-free or organic.
The retail milk samples obtained from the 48 contiguous states represented the consumer supply of pasteurized, homogenized milk of three milk types: conventionally produced milk with no specialty labeling, milk labeled rbST-free, and milk labeled organic. The study found no statistical differences in the FA composition of conventional and rbST-free milk; however, the two groups were statistically different from organic milk for several FA. When measuring FA as a percentage of total FA, organic milk was higher in saturated FA (65.9 vs. 62.8%) and lower in monounsaturated FA (26.8 vs. 29.7%) and polyunsaturated FA (4.3 vs. 4.8%) compared with the average of conventional and rbST-free retail milk samples. Likewise, among bioactive FA compared as a percentage of total FA, organic milk was slightly lower in trans 18:1 FA (2.8 vs. 3.1%) and higher in n-3 FA (0.82 vs. 0.50%) and conjugated linoleic acid (0.70 vs. 0.57%).
From a public health perspective, the direction for some of these differences would be considered desirable and for others would be considered undesirable; however, without exception, the magnitudes of the differences in milk FA composition among milk label types were minor and of no physiological importance when considering public health or dietary recommendations, study results stated.
Overall, when data from the analysis of FA composition of conventional milk and milk labeled rbST-free or organic were combined with previous analytical comparisons of the quality and composition of these retail milk samples, results established that there were no meaningful differences that would affect public health and that all milks were similar in nutritional quality and wholesomeness.
The full report is available at the Journal of Dairy Science.
Latest from Quality Assurance & Food Safety
- FDA Releases Produce Regulatory Program Standards
- Invest in People or Risk the System: Darin Detwiler and Catalyst Food Leaders on Building Real Food Safety Culture
- USDA Proposes Increasing Poultry, Pork Line Speeds
- FDA Releases New Traceability Rule Guidance
- TraceGains and iFoodDS Extend Strategic Alliance
- bioMérieux Launches New Platform for Spoiler Risk Management
- SafetyChain Receives SOC 2 Type 2 Certification
- Puratos Acquires Pennsylvania-Based Vör Foods