Several consumer groups are lining up behind a proposal to charge food companies a registration fee as an alternative to import user fees to boost FDA's food safety budget. Consumer groups generally oppose user fees because they create the appearance of a conflict of interest.
"We prefer this approach to a fee-for-service system for food inspections, where inspectors may believe they are working for the companies rather than the public," Caroline Smith DeWaal, food safety director for the Center for Science in the Public Interest, wrote Wednesday in response to a question from Senate Health, Education, Labor and Pensions Chairman Edward Kennedy, D-Mass.
Kennedy is working with committee members to write a food safety bill that many stakeholders want to address not just imports, but domestic food safety as well.
"The focus on imports is certainly appropriate, but there are enough problems with domestic food that we need a broader bill," DeWaal said. The Bush administration, along with House Energy and Commerce Chairman John Dingell, D-Mich., has focused on imports after pet food and fish imported from China came up contaminated last year, although other deadly outbreaks stemmed from domestic spinach and peanut butter.
Read the full GovernmentExecutive.com story here.
Latest from Quality Assurance & Food Safety
- FDA, CDC Investigate Salmonella Outbreak Linked to Live It Up Dietary Supplement Powder
- USDA FSIS Announces New Deputy Administrator of Field Operations
- ProVeg Incubator Launches Fast-Track to Impact Program for Alt-Protein Startups
- Kerry Releases 2026 Global Taste Charts
- FDA Shares Australia Certificate Requirements for Bivalve Molluscs and Related Products
- FDA Announces Update from CFIA on Certificate Requirements for Certain Meat, Poultry Products
- NIMA Partners Introduces the Next-Generation NIMA Gluten Sensor
- IFT to Host Community Conversation on Dietary Guidelines for Americans, 2025-2030 Report