Pennsylvania Pork Producer Challenges Controversial Agriculture Legislation in Congress

The broad scope of the legislation places many state laws at risk, including those impacting food quality and safety, infectious disease containment, kosher and halal labeling standards and the prevention of invasive pests, according to the Humane Society Legislative Fund.


WASHINGTON — The Humane Society Legislative Fund (HSLF) launched an advertising campaign highlighting farmers’ opposition to the “Ending Agricultural Trade Suppression” (EATS) Act, which was introduced in both chambers of Congress this summer. The campaign features Brent Hershey, owner and president of Hershey Ag, Mount Joy, Pa.

The EATS Act could wipe out many of states’ agriculture laws, according to HSLF. The broad scope of the legislation places many state laws at risk, the organization said, including those impacting food quality and safety, infectious disease containment, kosher and halal labeling standards and the prevention of invasive pests. A report published by the Harvard Law School in July highlighted over 1,000 state laws that could be eliminated if the EATS Act becomes law.

“When it comes to agriculture, Pennsylvania farmers know better than Congress,” said Hershey. “The EATS Act represents a heavy-handed effort to maintain outdated methods that ignore innovation in Pennsylvania’s agricultural sector — something Congress has no place supporting.”

The campaign features two 30 second cuts, along with an extended version:

Some of America’s well-known pork producers, such as the Clemens Food Group and Niman Ranch, have publicly stated that they do not support the EATS Act. 

“When you look at a mother pig living in a gestation crate, you’re looking at a relic  an inhumane housing system which forces the pig to live in an area barely bigger than the animal's body and unable to turn around,” said Sara Amundson, president of the Humane Society Legislative Fund. “The EATS Act is a blatant attack on states’ rights, which could eliminate state laws safeguarding farms, food, people and animals within their borders and potentially undermine crucial public safety measures across the country. EATS, or anything like it, would only serve as a poison pill for the Farm Bill or any year-end package Congress may consider.”

The Farm Bill, a sweeping legislative package directing federal agricultural policies and priorities for the next five years, is a key piece of legislation under consideration by Congress. The current Farm Bill expired at the end of September, and Congress must pass a new bill as soon as possible to continue funding critical agriculture programs.

More than 200 federal lawmakers — including 30 Senators through a letter to Senate Agriculture Committee leadership and 172 Representatives spanning 35 states in a letter to House Agriculture Committee leaders — have publicly stated that neither the EATS Act nor anything like it should be part of the upcoming Farm Bill. In addition, a diverse set of more than 2,000 entities, including organizations, individuals and more than 1,200 farms across the country, have publicly stated opposition to the EATS Act.