Though the Food Safety Modernization Act (FSMA) was passed nearly nine years ago, some aspects are still being rolled out with others requiring regular updates. Do you understand all the changes wrought by the rules – particularly those for pest management?
Enacted to better protect public health by strengthening the food safety system, FSMA focuses on preventing food safety problems rather than relying primarily on reacting to problems after they occur. Applying equally to pest management as to other food facility practices and programs, this focus serves to change the “conventional wisdom” of reaction: If there isn’t a current pest problem, there is no need to add to or change pest management practices, to prevention: Facilities must continually and actively seek to improve pest mitigation—and proactively implement preventive controls even when no pest issues exist.
Although FSMA does not detail standard requirements for pest management, what it does say about pest management is almost identical to Good Manufacturing Practices (GMPs) previously published as FDA guidance — except that the wording has been changed from “should” and “may” to “must” — making GMPs are no longer recommendations; they are now regulation. FSMA also requires that pest management preventive controls be included in the written Food Safety Plan.
A look at FDA’s 483 Inspection Observations (a list of conditions inspectors have deemed to be objectionable and indicating that an FDA-regulated product may violate FDA regulations) also provides an overview of pest management practices the agency sees as critical. Included among the top observations cited in fiscal year 2018 were:
As the highest priority — and severity — Category I pests are those that are potential vectors for foodborne pathogens. Pests that are known to carry pathogens are considered vectors regardless of whether a microbiological hazard is actually detected. In other words, FDA states, “If a pest lives around people, enters buildings, is attracted to and moves back and forth between filth and human food, and is known to carry food-borne pathogens, it is a Category I pest.”
This gains significance with the FSMA changes. Previous FDA standards focused on identifying a contaminant or adulterant in finished product, but FSMA moved that focus up the production line. Now, any evidence that suggests a product may have been adulterated can lead to action against the facility—regardless of whether there is evidence of actual contamination or adulteration in the end product.
Latest from Quality Assurance & Food Safety
- USDA Indefinitely Delays Salmonella Testing Program for Raw Breaded Stuffed Chicken
- American Soybean Association Names New Industry Relations Leadership
- Babybel Transitions From Cellophane to Paper Packaging
- Ambriola Company Recalls Cheese Products Due to Listeria Risk
- Horizon Family Brands Acquires Maple Hill Creamery
- Kellanova Shares Top Five Consumer Packaged Goods Tech Trends Shaping 2026
- Stay Ahead of Supply Chain Pressure
- Brendan Niemira Named IFT Chief Science and Technology Officer